For those fascinated by how physics explains the
universe and affects philosophy, this in-depth
presentation of the cosmos, complete with an appendix of
mathematical formulas, makes accessible to lay readers
findings normally available only to professional
scientists. In a series of remarkable developments in
the 20th century and continuing into the 21st,
elementary particle physicists, astronomers, and
cosmologists have removed much of the mystery that
surrounds our understanding of the physical universe. We
now have mathematical models that are consistent with
all observational data, including measurements of
incredible precision, and we have a good understanding
of why those models take the form they do. But the
question arises: Where do the "laws" revealed by the
mathematical models come from? Some conjecture that they
represent a set of restraints on the behavior of matter
that are built into the structure of the universe,
either by God or some other ubiquitous governing
principle. In this challenging, stimulating discussion
of physics and its implications, the author disputes
this notion. Instead, he argues that physical laws are
simply restrictions on the ways physicists may draw the
models they use to represent the behavior of matter if
they wish to do so objectively. Since mathematical
descriptions of data must be independent of any specific
point of view, that is, they must possess "point-of-view
invariance" (maximum objectivity), they naturally
conform to certain fundamental laws that insure that
objectivity, such as the great conservation principles
of energy and momentum. The laws of physics, however,
are not simply an arbitrary set of rules since the
observed data beautifully demonstrate their
accuracy.
|
|